DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Seat Altea vs 2013 Honda CR-Z Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Altea

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeHonda
AlteaModelCR-Z
2013Model year2013
MPVBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
194 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
125 HPPower114 HP
200 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank40 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption5,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4282 mmLength4078 mm
1768 mmWidth2013 mm
1576 mmHeight1395 mm
1439 KgWeight1147 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2435 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Seat Altea and 2013 Honda CR-Z approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Altea leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…