DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Seat Altea vs 2006 Honda FIT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Altea

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Seat AlteaSpecificationHonda FIT
SeatMakeHonda
AlteaModelFIT
2006Model year2006
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Seat AlteaSpecificationHonda FIT
10,3 s0–100 km/h—
194 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1496 cc
125 HPPower110 HP
200 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Seat AlteaSpecificationHonda FIT
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank42 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption—
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Seat AlteaSpecificationHonda FIT
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
205/55 R16Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Seat AlteaSpecificationHonda FIT
4280 mmLength3830 mm
1768 mmWidth1675 mm
1568 mmHeight1525 mm
1320 KgWeight1010 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Seat Altea and 2006 Honda FIT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Altea leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…