DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Honda FIT vs 2006 Seat Altea Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Altea

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Honda FITSpecificationSeat Altea
HondaMakeSeat
FITModelAltea
2006Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Honda FITSpecificationSeat Altea
—0–100 km/h10,3 s
0 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
110 HPPower125 HP
143 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Honda FITSpecificationSeat Altea
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption8,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,4 lt
—Average consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Honda FITSpecificationSeat Altea
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Honda FITSpecificationSeat Altea
3830 mmLength4280 mm
1675 mmWidth1768 mm
1525 mmHeight1568 mm
1010 KgWeight1320 Kg
2450 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Honda FIT and 2006 Seat Altea approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Altea leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…