DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Rover 200 vs 2000 Seat Alhambra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Alhambra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeSeat
200ModelAlhambra
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
3/5Doors5

Performance

7,5 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
204 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
145 HPPower150 HP
174 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption14 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15 VTyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3973 mmLength4617 mm
1688 mmWidth1810 mm
1419 mmHeight1728 mm
1135 KgWeight1754 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Rover 200 and 2000 Seat Alhambra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Alhambra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…