DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Seat Alhambra vs 2000 Mazda Roadster Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Alhambra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SeatMakeMazda
AlhambraModelRoadster
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeRoadster
7Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h—
194 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
150 HPPower146 HP
210 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank48 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
8 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4617 mmLength3955 mm
1810 mmWidth1680 mm
1728 mmHeight1235 mm
1754 KgWeight1010 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2265 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Seat Alhambra and 2000 Mazda Roadster approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Alhambra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…