DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Saturn SL vs 2000 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saturn SL

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saturn SLSpecificationVolvo S40
SaturnMakeVolvo
SLModelS40
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Saturn SLSpecificationVolvo S40
9,0 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
160 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1901 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
126 HPPower122 HP
165 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saturn SLSpecificationVolvo S40
PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Saturn SLSpecificationVolvo S40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15 TTyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saturn SLSpecificationVolvo S40
4524 mmLength4516 mm
1687 mmWidth1716 mm
1397 mmHeight1422 mm
1088 KgWeight1230 Kg
2601 mmWheelbase2562 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Saturn SL and 2000 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saturn SL leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…