DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Saturn SL vs 2000 Opel Vectra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saturn SL

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SaturnMakeOpel
SLModelVectra
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
160 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1901 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
126 HPPower125 HP
165 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption11 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15 TTyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4524 mmLength4495 mm
1687 mmWidth1707 mm
1397 mmHeight1425 mm
1088 KgWeight1345 Kg
2601 mmWheelbase2637 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Saturn SL and 2000 Opel Vectra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saturn SL leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…