DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Saturn SL vs 2000 Mazda Capella Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saturn SL

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SaturnMakeMazda
SLModelCapella
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h—
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1901 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
126 HPPower125 HP
165 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
185/65 R15 TTyre size175/70 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

4524 mmLength4575 mm
1687 mmWidth1695 mm
1397 mmHeight1440 mm
1088 KgWeight1210 Kg
2601 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Saturn SL and 2000 Mazda Capella approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saturn SL leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…