DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Saturn SC vs 2002 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saturn SC

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saturn SCSpecificationSaab 9-3
SaturnMakeSaab
SCModel9-3
2002Model year2002
CoupeBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

Saturn SCSpecificationSaab 9-3
8,2 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
197 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1901 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
126 HPPower130 HP
165 NmTorque177 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saturn SCSpecificationSaab 9-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
46 ltFuel tank68 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption14,2 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saturn SCSpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saturn SCSpecificationSaab 9-3
4575 mmLength4629 mm
1709 mmWidth1711 mm
1326 mmHeight1428 mm
1415 KgWeight1345 Kg
2601 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Saturn SC and 2002 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saturn SC leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…