DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Saturn Outlook vs 2015 Mazda CX-9 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saturn Outlook

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SaturnMakeMazda
OutlookModelCX-9
2010Model year2015
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3726 cc
269 HPPower273 HP
331 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank76 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
255/65 R18Tyre size245/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5097 mmLength5232 mm
1986 mmWidth1935 mm
1776 mmHeight1727 mm
2145 KgWeight1958 Kg
3021 mmWheelbase2875 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Saturn Outlook and 2015 Mazda CX-9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saturn Outlook leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…