DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Mazda CX-9 vs 2010 Saturn Outlook Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saturn Outlook

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSaturn
CX-9ModelOutlook
2015Model year2010
SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3726 ccEngine displacement3564 cc
273 HPPower269 HP
270 NmTorque331 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
76 ltFuel tank83 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption13,9 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
245/60 R18Tyre size255/65 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5232 mmLength5097 mm
1935 mmWidth1986 mm
1727 mmHeight1776 mm
1958 KgWeight2145 Kg
2875 mmWheelbase3021 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Mazda CX-9 and 2010 Saturn Outlook approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saturn Outlook leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…