E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1978 Saab 96 vs 1978 Audi 50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 96

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.5–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 96SpecificationAudi 50
SaabMakeAudi
96Model50
1978Model year1978
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

Saab 96SpecificationAudi 50
—0–100 km/h12,9 s
0 km/hTop speed152 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1272 cc
68 HPPower60 HP
115 NmTorque93 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 96SpecificationAudi 50
PetrolFuel typePetrol
38 ltFuel tank36 lt
—Average consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 96SpecificationAudi 50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
155/80 SR15Tyre size—

Dimensions

Saab 96SpecificationAudi 50
4300 mmLength3538 mm
1590 mmWidth1560 mm
1470 mmHeight1344 mm
930 KgWeight685 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2335 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1978 Saab 96 and 1978 Audi 50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 96 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1978 Audi 80VS1978 Saab 96Audi 80 vs Saab 961978 and 1978 model years1978 Audi 100VS1978 Saab 96Audi 100 vs Saab 961978 and 1978 model yearsImage unavailableVS1978 Saab 96BMW 3 Serisi vs Saab 961978 and 1978 model years1978 Audi 50VS1978 Saab 96Audi 50 vs Saab 961978 and 1978 model years1976 Porsche 914VS1978 Saab 96Porsche 914 vs Saab 961976 and 1978 model years

Comments are loading…