DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1978 BMW 3 Serisi vs 1978 Saab 96 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 96

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW 3 SerisiSpecificationSaab 96
BMWMakeSaab
3 SerisiModel96
1978Model year1978
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
2Doors2

Performance

BMW 3 SerisiSpecificationSaab 96
12,5 s0–100 km/h—
167 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1573 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
90 HPPower68 HP
0 NmTorque115 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW 3 SerisiSpecificationSaab 96
PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank38 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

BMW 3 SerisiSpecificationSaab 96
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
—Tyre size155/80 SR15

Dimensions

BMW 3 SerisiSpecificationSaab 96
4355 mmLength4300 mm
1610 mmWidth1590 mm
1380 mmHeight1470 mm
1020 KgWeight930 Kg
2563 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1978 BMW 3 Serisi and 1978 Saab 96 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 96 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…