DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1976 Saab 96 vs 1976 Audi 50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 96

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.5–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 96SpecificationAudi 50
SaabMakeAudi
96Model50
1976Model year1976
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
2Doors3

Performance

Saab 96SpecificationAudi 50
—0–100 km/h13,5 s
145 km/hTop speed152 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1093 cc
63 HPPower60 HP
115 NmTorque83 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 96SpecificationAudi 50
PetrolFuel typePetrol
38 ltFuel tank36 lt
—Average consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 96SpecificationAudi 50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4

Dimensions

Saab 96SpecificationAudi 50
4170 mmLength3525 mm
1575 mmWidth1560 mm
1473 mmHeight1344 mm
930 KgWeight685 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2335 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1976 Saab 96 and 1976 Audi 50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 96 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…