E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1976 Audi 50 vs 1976 Saab 96 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 96

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

51.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 50SpecificationSaab 96
AudiMakeSaab
50Model96
1976Model year1976
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors2

Performance

Audi 50SpecificationSaab 96
13,5 s0–100 km/h—
152 km/hTop speed145 km/h
1093 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
60 HPPower63 HP
83 NmTorque115 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 50SpecificationSaab 96
PetrolFuel typePetrol
36 ltFuel tank38 lt
8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 50SpecificationSaab 96
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4

Dimensions

Audi 50SpecificationSaab 96
3525 mmLength4170 mm
1560 mmWidth1575 mm
1344 mmHeight1473 mm
685 KgWeight930 Kg
2335 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1976 Audi 50 and 1976 Saab 96 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 96 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Image unavailableVS1976 Audi 50Citroen AMI vs Audi 501976 and 1976 model years1976 Opel KadettVS1976 Audi 50Opel Kadett vs Audi 501976 and 1976 model years1976 Lada 2106VS1976 Audi 50Lada 2106 vs Audi 501976 and 1976 model years1976 Dacia 1300VS1976 Audi 50Dacia 1300 vs Audi 501976 and 1976 model yearsImage unavailableVS1976 Audi 50Fiat X 1/9 vs Audi 501976 and 1976 model years

Comments are loading…