DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 AC Cobra vs 1999 Mercedes-Benz CL Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

AC Cobra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

87.5–86.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ACMakeMercedes-Benz
CobraModelCL
1997Model year1999
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

4,2 s0–100 km/h6,5 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4942 ccEngine displacement4966 cc
326 HPPower306 HP
522 NmTorque460 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank88 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption19,4 lt
10,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,9 lt
—Average consumption12,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 VR16; 255/50 VR16Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4200 mmLength4993 mm
1745 mmWidth1857 mm
1200 mmHeight1398 mm
1160 KgWeight1795 Kg
2285 mmWheelbase2885 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 AC Cobra and 1999 Mercedes-Benz CL approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, AC Cobra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…