DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mercedes-Benz CL vs 1997 AC Cobra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

AC Cobra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

86.5–87.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeAC
CLModelCobra
1999Model year1997
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

6,5 s0–100 km/h4,2 s
250 km/hTop speed250 km/h
4966 ccEngine displacement4942 cc
306 HPPower326 HP
460 NmTorque522 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
88 ltFuel tank70 lt
19,4 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
9,9 ltExtra-urban consumption10,9 lt
12,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/55 R17Tyre size225/50 VR16; 255/50 VR16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4993 mmLength4200 mm
1857 mmWidth1745 mm
1398 mmHeight1200 mm
1795 KgWeight1160 Kg
2885 mmWheelbase2285 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mercedes-Benz CL and 1997 AC Cobra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, AC Cobra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…