DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Ford Thunderbird vs 2005 Saab 9-7X Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-7X

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeSaab
ThunderbirdModel9-7X
2004Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

6,8 s0–100 km/h8,6 s
220 km/hTop speed191 km/h
3950 ccEngine displacement4157 cc
283 HPPower279 HP
388 NmTorque373 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank83 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
10,3 ltExtra-urban consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
235/50 R17Tyre size255/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4730 mmLength4922 mm
1829 mmWidth1915 mm
1323 mmHeight1791 mm
1748 KgWeight2140 Kg
2723 mmWheelbase2870 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Ford Thunderbird and 2005 Saab 9-7X approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-7X leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…