2003 • Saab
9-5
Saab 9-5 2.3 T (250 Hp) 2003Overall Score75.75/100
2003 Saab 9-5 vs 2005 Fiat Croma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Fiat
Croma
Fiat Croma 2.4 Multijet (200 Hp) 2005Overall Score76.75/100
WINNER
Fiat Croma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
75.75–76.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Saab 9-5SpecificationFiat Croma
SaabMakeFiat
9-5ModelCroma
2003Model year2005
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Saab 9-5SpecificationFiat Croma
7,3 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
245 km/hTop speed216 km/h
2290 ccEngine displacement2387 cc
250 HPPower200 HP
350 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Saab 9-5SpecificationFiat Croma
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank62 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption11,5 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
9 ltAverage consumption8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Saab 9-5SpecificationFiat Croma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size215/50 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Saab 9-5SpecificationFiat Croma
4828 mmLength4756 mm
1792 mmWidth1775 mm
1501 mmHeight1597 mm
1660 KgWeight1650 Kg
2703 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Saab 9-5 and 2005 Fiat Croma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Croma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…