2005 • Fiat
Croma
Fiat Croma 2.4 Multijet (200 Hp) 2005Overall Score76.75/100
2005 Fiat Croma vs 2003 Saab 9-5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Saab
9-5
Saab 9-5 2.3 T (250 Hp) 2003Overall Score75.75/100
WINNER
Fiat Croma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
76.75–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Fiat CromaSpecificationSaab 9-5
FiatMakeSaab
CromaModel9-5
2005Model year2003
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Fiat CromaSpecificationSaab 9-5
8,5 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
216 km/hTop speed245 km/h
2387 ccEngine displacement2290 cc
200 HPPower250 HP
400 NmTorque350 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Fiat CromaSpecificationSaab 9-5
DieselFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption12,9 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
8 ltAverage consumption9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Fiat CromaSpecificationSaab 9-5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
215/50 R17Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Fiat CromaSpecificationSaab 9-5
4756 mmLength4828 mm
1775 mmWidth1792 mm
1597 mmHeight1501 mm
1650 KgWeight1660 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2703 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Fiat Croma and 2003 Saab 9-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Fiat Croma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…