2002 • Saab
9-5
Saab 9-5 2.3 T (250 Hp) 2002Overall Score75.75/100
2002 Saab 9-5 vs 1999 Nissan Cedric Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.5T (260 Hp) 1999Overall Score74.75/100
WINNER
Saab 9-5
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
75.75–74.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Saab 9-5SpecificationNissan Cedric
SaabMakeNissan
9-5ModelCedric
2002Model year1999
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Saab 9-5SpecificationNissan Cedric
7,3 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
245 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2290 ccEngine displacement2498 cc
250 HPPower260 HP
350 NmTorque324 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Saab 9-5SpecificationNissan Cedric
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank80 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9 ltAverage consumption12,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Saab 9-5SpecificationNissan Cedric
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears4
225/45 R17Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Saab 9-5SpecificationNissan Cedric
4828 mmLength4860 mm
1792 mmWidth1770 mm
1501 mmHeight1465 mm
1660 KgWeight1710 Kg
2703 mmWheelbase2800 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Saab 9-5 and 1999 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Saab 9-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…