1999 • Nissan
Cedric
Nissan Cedric 2.5T (260 Hp) 1999Overall Score74.75/100
1999 Nissan Cedric vs 2002 Saab 9-5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Saab
9-5
Saab 9-5 2.3 T (250 Hp) 2002Overall Score75.75/100
WINNER
Saab 9-5
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
74.75–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CedricSpecificationSaab 9-5
NissanMakeSaab
CedricModel9-5
1999Model year2002
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Nissan CedricSpecificationSaab 9-5
7,8 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
235 km/hTop speed245 km/h
2498 ccEngine displacement2290 cc
260 HPPower250 HP
324 NmTorque350 Nm
6Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CedricSpecificationSaab 9-5
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption12,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
12,5 ltAverage consumption9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CedricSpecificationSaab 9-5
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CedricSpecificationSaab 9-5
4860 mmLength4828 mm
1770 mmWidth1792 mm
1465 mmHeight1501 mm
1710 KgWeight1660 Kg
2800 mmWheelbase2703 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Nissan Cedric and 2002 Saab 9-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Saab 9-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…