DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Saab 9-5 vs 2004 Mazda Atenza Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Atenza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SaabMakeMazda
9-5ModelAtenza
2005Model year2004
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,4 s0–100 km/h—
225 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2290 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
185 HPPower178 HP
280 NmTorque216 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank64 lt
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/55 R16Tyre size195/65 R15 91 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4827 mmLength4745 mm
1792 mmWidth1780 mm
1475 mmHeight1440 mm
1715 KgWeight1340 Kg
2703 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Saab 9-5 and 2004 Mazda Atenza approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Atenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…