DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Saab 9-3 vs 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 156

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SaabMakeAlfa Romeo
9-3Model156
2005Model year2004
CabrioletBody typeSedan
4Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h6,3 s
245 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2792 ccEngine displacement3179 cc
250 HPPower250 HP
350 NmTorque300 Nm
—Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption18,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,6 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption12,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size225/45 ZR 17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4635 mmLength4430 mm
1762 mmWidth1745 mm
1434 mmHeight1415 mm
—Weight1410 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Saab 9-3 and 2004 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 156 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…