2012 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.8 i V6 24V (280 Hp) 2012Overall Score85.5/100
2012 Saab 9-3 vs 2010 Nissan Cima Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Nissan
Cima
Nissan Cima 3.0 i V6 24V Turbo (280 Hp) 2010Overall Score84.75/100
WINNER
Saab 9-3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
85.5–84.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Saab 9-3SpecificationNissan Cima
SaabMakeNissan
9-3ModelCima
2012Model year2010
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Saab 9-3SpecificationNissan Cima
5,7 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2792 ccEngine displacement2988 cc
280 HPPower280 HP
400 NmTorque387 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Saab 9-3SpecificationNissan Cima
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,4 ltUrban consumption—
8,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,9 ltAverage consumption11 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Saab 9-3SpecificationNissan Cima
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
225/45 R17Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Saab 9-3SpecificationNissan Cima
4635 mmLength4970 mm
1762 mmWidth1820 mm
1466 mmHeight1450 mm
1555 KgWeight1670 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2830 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Saab 9-3 and 2010 Nissan Cima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…