2010 • Nissan
Cima
Nissan Cima 3.0 i V6 24V Turbo (280 Hp) 2010Overall Score84.75/100
2010 Nissan Cima vs 2012 Saab 9-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.8 i V6 24V (280 Hp) 2012Overall Score85.5/100
WINNER
Saab 9-3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
84.75–85.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan CimaSpecificationSaab 9-3
NissanMakeSaab
CimaModel9-3
2010Model year2012
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Nissan CimaSpecificationSaab 9-3
—0–100 km/h5,7 s
230 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2988 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
280 HPPower280 HP
387 NmTorque400 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan CimaSpecificationSaab 9-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption13,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,0 lt
11 ltAverage consumption10,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan CimaSpecificationSaab 9-3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/55 R17Tyre size225/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan CimaSpecificationSaab 9-3
4970 mmLength4635 mm
1820 mmWidth1762 mm
1450 mmHeight1466 mm
1670 KgWeight1555 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2675 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Nissan Cima and 2012 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…