DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Saab 9-3 vs 2004 Cadillac CTS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SaabMakeCadillac
9-3ModelCTS
2005Model year2004
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

7,5 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
235 km/hTop speed226 km/h
2792 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
230 HPPower215 HP
320 NmTorque262 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank66 lt
15,5 ltUrban consumption17 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R17Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4654 mmLength4828 mm
1782 mmWidth1795 mm
1507 mmHeight1441 mm
1570 KgWeight1705 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Saab 9-3 and 2004 Cadillac CTS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…