DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Saab 9-3 vs 1998 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

61.5–61.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SaabMakeLand Rover
9-3ModelRange Rover
1998Model year1998
CabrioletBody typeEstate
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h14,3 s
205 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2290 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
150 HPPower136 HP
210 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank100 lt
14,8 ltUrban consumption12,8 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption8,9 lt
—Average consumption10,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
195/65 VR16Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4629 mmLength4713 mm
1711 mmWidth1853 mm
1440 mmHeight1817 mm
1600 KgWeight2115 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2745 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Saab 9-3 and 1998 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…