DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Land Rover Range Rover vs 1998 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

61.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeSaab
Range RoverModel9-3
1998Model year1998
EstateBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

14,3 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
185 km/hTop speed205 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2290 cc
136 HPPower150 HP
270 NmTorque210 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank68 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption14,8 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/70 R16Tyre size195/65 VR16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4713 mmLength4629 mm
1853 mmWidth1711 mm
1817 mmHeight1440 mm
2115 KgWeight1600 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Land Rover Range Rover and 1998 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…