DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Saab 9-3 vs 2002 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-3SpecificationMG ZS
SaabMakeMG
9-3ModelZS
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Saab 9-3SpecificationMG ZS
10,3 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
200 km/hTop speed193 km/h
2171 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
125 HPPower113 HP
280 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-3SpecificationMG ZS
DieselFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption7,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-3SpecificationMG ZS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-3SpecificationMG ZS
4629 mmLength4520 mm
1711 mmWidth1700 mm
1428 mmHeight1390 mm
1560 KgWeight1225 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Saab 9-3 and 2002 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…