DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 BMW Z3 vs 2002 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationSaab 9-3
BMWMakeSaab
Z3Model9-3
2002Model year2002
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors3/5

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationSaab 9-3
10,4 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
196 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1895 ccEngine displacement2171 cc
118 HPPower125 HP
190 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationSaab 9-3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank68 lt
11 ltUrban consumption—
6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationSaab 9-3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R16Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationSaab 9-3
4050 mmLength4629 mm
1740 mmWidth1711 mm
1288 mmHeight1428 mm
1220 KgWeight1560 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 BMW Z3 and 2002 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…