DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Saab 9-3 vs 2002 MG ZR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-3SpecificationMG ZR
SaabMakeMG
9-3ModelZR
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

Saab 9-3SpecificationMG ZR
10,3 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
200 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2171 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
125 HPPower113 HP
280 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-3SpecificationMG ZR
DieselFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption7,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-3SpecificationMG ZR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-3SpecificationMG ZR
4629 mmLength4011 mm
1711 mmWidth1690 mm
1428 mmHeight1400 mm
1560 KgWeight1155 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Saab 9-3 and 2002 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…