DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Saab 9-3 vs 2000 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-3SpecificationBMW Z3
SaabMakeBMW
9-3ModelZ3
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
3/5Doors2

Performance

Saab 9-3SpecificationBMW Z3
10,9 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
200 km/hTop speed196 km/h
2171 ccEngine displacement1895 cc
115 HPPower118 HP
260 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-3SpecificationBMW Z3
DieselFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank51 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption11 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-3SpecificationBMW Z3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-3SpecificationBMW Z3
4629 mmLength4050 mm
1711 mmWidth1740 mm
1428 mmHeight1288 mm
1350 KgWeight1220 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Saab 9-3 and 2000 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…