DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Rover 25 vs 2000 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 25SpecificationSaab 9-3
RoverMakeSaab
25Model9-3
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

Rover 25SpecificationSaab 9-3
9,9 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
185 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2171 cc
101 HPPower115 HP
240 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 25SpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank68 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 25SpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 25SpecificationSaab 9-3
3990 mmLength4629 mm
1688 mmWidth1711 mm
1419 mmHeight1428 mm
1130 KgWeight1350 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Rover 25 and 2000 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…