DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Saab 9-3 vs 2000 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-3SpecificationRover 25
SaabMakeRover
9-3Model25
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

Saab 9-3SpecificationRover 25
10,9 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
200 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2171 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
115 HPPower101 HP
260 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-3SpecificationRover 25
DieselFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-3SpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-3SpecificationRover 25
4629 mmLength3990 mm
1711 mmWidth1688 mm
1428 mmHeight1419 mm
1350 KgWeight1130 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Saab 9-3 and 2000 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…