DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Saab 9-3 vs 2002 Saturn SC Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saturn SC

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-3SpecificationSaturn SC
SaabMakeSaturn
9-3ModelSC
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
3/5Doors3

Performance

Saab 9-3SpecificationSaturn SC
11,0 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
200 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1985 ccEngine displacement1901 cc
130 HPPower126 HP
177 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-3SpecificationSaturn SC
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank46 lt
14,2 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-3SpecificationSaturn SC
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-3SpecificationSaturn SC
4629 mmLength4575 mm
1711 mmWidth1709 mm
1428 mmHeight1326 mm
1345 KgWeight1415 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2601 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Saab 9-3 and 2002 Saturn SC approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saturn SC leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…