DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Saab 9-3 vs 2000 Lancia Zeta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Zeta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-3SpecificationLancia Zeta
SaabMakeLancia
9-3ModelZeta
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Saab 9-3SpecificationLancia Zeta
11,0 s0–100 km/h14,8 s
200 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1985 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
130 HPPower136 HP
177 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-3SpecificationLancia Zeta
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank80 lt
14,2 ltUrban consumption12,7 lt
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-3SpecificationLancia Zeta
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-3SpecificationLancia Zeta
4629 mmLength4470 mm
1711 mmWidth1834 mm
1428 mmHeight1714 mm
1345 KgWeight1615 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Saab 9-3 and 2000 Lancia Zeta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Zeta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…