DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Lancia Zeta vs 2000 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Zeta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lancia ZetaSpecificationSaab 9-3
LanciaMakeSaab
ZetaModel9-3
2000Model year2000
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Lancia ZetaSpecificationSaab 9-3
14,8 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
175 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
136 HPPower130 HP
250 NmTorque177 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Lancia ZetaSpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank68 lt
12,7 ltUrban consumption14,2 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Lancia ZetaSpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Lancia ZetaSpecificationSaab 9-3
4470 mmLength4629 mm
1834 mmWidth1711 mm
1714 mmHeight1428 mm
1615 KgWeight1345 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2605 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Lancia Zeta and 2000 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Zeta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…