DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Saab 9-3 vs 2012 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SaabMakeRenault
9-3ModelMegane
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

7,9 s0–100 km/h8,5 s
230 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1985 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
200 HPPower190 HP
280 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
14,4 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
10,3 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R15Tyre size225/40 R18 92 Y
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4635 mmLength4299 mm
1762 mmWidth1785 mm
1466 mmHeight1423 mm
1440 KgWeight1319 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Saab 9-3 and 2012 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…