DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Renault Megane vs 2012 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeSaab
MeganeModel9-3
2012Model year2012
CoupeBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

8,5 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
230 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
190 HPPower200 HP
300 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank62 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption14,4 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption10,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/40 R18 92 YTyre size215/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4299 mmLength4635 mm
1785 mmWidth1762 mm
1423 mmHeight1466 mm
1319 KgWeight1440 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Renault Megane and 2012 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…