DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Saab 9-3 vs 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Cobalt

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SaabMakeChevrolet
9-3ModelCobalt
2004Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
4Seats5
2Doors2

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h—
230 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
210 HPPower205 HP
300 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank49 lt
—Urban consumption10,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,4 lt
9 ltAverage consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/50 R17Tyre size215/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4635 mmLength4580 mm
1762 mmWidth1725 mm
1434 mmHeight1415 mm
1590 KgWeight1274 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2624 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Saab 9-3 and 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Cobalt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…