2005 • Chevrolet
Cobalt
Chevrolet Cobalt 2.0 i 16V SS (205 Hp) 2005Overall Score71.5/100
2005 Chevrolet Cobalt vs 2004 Saab 9-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.0 T (210 Hp) 2004Overall Score70.75/100
WINNER
Chevrolet Cobalt
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Chevrolet CobaltSpecificationSaab 9-3
ChevroletMakeSaab
CobaltModel9-3
2005Model year2004
CoupeBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
2Doors2
Performance
Chevrolet CobaltSpecificationSaab 9-3
—0–100 km/h8,0 s
0 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
205 HPPower210 HP
230 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Chevrolet CobaltSpecificationSaab 9-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
49 ltFuel tank62 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption—
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9 ltAverage consumption9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Chevrolet CobaltSpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/45 R18Tyre size215/50 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Chevrolet CobaltSpecificationSaab 9-3
4580 mmLength4635 mm
1725 mmWidth1762 mm
1415 mmHeight1434 mm
1274 KgWeight1590 Kg
2624 mmWheelbase2675 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Chevrolet Cobalt and 2004 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chevrolet Cobalt leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…