DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Saab 9-3 vs 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SaabMakeMercedes-Benz
9-3ModelCLK
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
4Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

8,0 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
230 km/hTop speed218 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
210 HPPower163 HP
300 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption13,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,2 lt
9 ltAverage consumption9,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/50 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4635 mmLength4567 mm
1762 mmWidth1722 mm
1434 mmHeight1380 mm
1590 KgWeight1615 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Saab 9-3 and 2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…