DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs 2003 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mercedes-BenzMakeSaab
CLKModel9-3
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
4Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h8,0 s
218 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
163 HPPower210 HP
230 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank62 lt
13,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,5 ltAverage consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size215/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4567 mmLength4635 mm
1722 mmWidth1762 mm
1380 mmHeight1434 mm
1615 KgWeight1590 Kg
—Wheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK and 2003 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…