DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Saab 9-3 vs 2002 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-3SpecificationBMW Z3
SaabMakeBMW
9-3ModelZ3
2002Model year2002
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
4Seats2
2Doors2

Performance

Saab 9-3SpecificationBMW Z3
8,0 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
230 km/hTop speed224 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2171 cc
210 HPPower170 HP
300 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-3SpecificationBMW Z3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption12,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,3 lt
9 ltAverage consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-3SpecificationBMW Z3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/50 R17Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-3SpecificationBMW Z3
4635 mmLength4050 mm
1762 mmWidth1740 mm
1434 mmHeight1293 mm
1590 KgWeight1345 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Saab 9-3 and 2002 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…