DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 BMW Z3 vs 2002 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationSaab 9-3
BMWMakeSaab
Z3Model9-3
2002Model year2002
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationSaab 9-3
7,9 s0–100 km/h8,0 s
224 km/hTop speed230 km/h
2171 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
170 HPPower210 HP
210 NmTorque300 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationSaab 9-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank62 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption—
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,2 ltAverage consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationSaab 9-3
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
225/50 R16Tyre size215/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationSaab 9-3
4050 mmLength4635 mm
1740 mmWidth1762 mm
1293 mmHeight1434 mm
1345 KgWeight1590 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 BMW Z3 and 2002 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…