DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Saab 9-3 vs 2005 BMW X3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-3SpecificationBMW X3
SaabMakeBMW
9-3ModelX3
2005Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeSUV
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Saab 9-3SpecificationBMW X3
9,0 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
220 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
175 HPPower150 HP
265 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-3SpecificationBMW X3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank67 lt
—Urban consumption13,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,1 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-3SpecificationBMW X3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/55 R16Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-3SpecificationBMW X3
4635 mmLength4569 mm
1762 mmWidth1853 mm
1434 mmHeight1674 mm
1580 KgWeight1660 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Saab 9-3 and 2005 BMW X3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…