DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Mazda 6 vs 2005 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 6SpecificationSaab 9-3
MazdaMakeSaab
6Model9-3
2005Model year2005
EstateBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

Mazda 6SpecificationSaab 9-3
9,8 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
201 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
143 HPPower175 HP
360 NmTorque265 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 6SpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank62 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,1 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 6SpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16 HTyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 6SpecificationSaab 9-3
4710 mmLength4635 mm
1780 mmWidth1762 mm
1480 mmHeight1434 mm
1520 KgWeight1580 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Mazda 6 and 2005 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…