DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Saab 9-3 vs 2005 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Saab 9-3SpecificationMazda 6
SaabMakeMazda
9-3Model6
2005Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeEstate
4Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

Saab 9-3SpecificationMazda 6
9,0 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
220 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
175 HPPower143 HP
265 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Saab 9-3SpecificationMazda 6
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank64 lt
—Urban consumption7,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,2 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Saab 9-3SpecificationMazda 6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Saab 9-3SpecificationMazda 6
4635 mmLength4710 mm
1762 mmWidth1780 mm
1434 mmHeight1480 mm
1580 KgWeight1520 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Saab 9-3 and 2005 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…