2003 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.0 t (150 Hp) 2003Overall Score65.5/100
2003 Saab 9-3 vs 2003 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 2.0 TDCi (136 Hp) 2003Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Saab 9-3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Saab 9-3SpecificationFord C-Max
SaabMakeFord
9-3ModelC-Max
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeMPV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Saab 9-3SpecificationFord C-Max
9,5 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
210 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
150 HPPower136 HP
240 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Saab 9-3SpecificationFord C-Max
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Saab 9-3SpecificationFord C-Max
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/60 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Saab 9-3SpecificationFord C-Max
4635 mmLength4330 mm
1762 mmWidth1820 mm
1466 mmHeight1600 mm
1440 KgWeight1391 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Saab 9-3 and 2003 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…